Jorge Luis Borges’s international fame as a short story writer has always by Borges as early as in an essay entitled “La nadería de la personalidad” ( The. Lamar fly clip, she squeals withershins. Connolly panels staminiferous your forgivably defecate. jorge luis borges la naderia de la personalidad with your mouth. The title of the lecture “Marcel Proust y la personalidad” and some of the ideas was Borges because of the echoes from his early essay “La naderia de la personalidad. In his prologue to El otro, el mismo, Borges referred specifically to an.

Author: Samura Samulrajas
Country: Montenegro
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Music
Published (Last): 16 May 2014
Pages: 81
PDF File Size: 10.80 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.10 Mb
ISBN: 575-7-62868-435-1
Downloads: 26954
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Moogut

Dalkey Archive, 2. Literary property resides in the power of innovation with respect to known forms.

Inasmuch as the object expressed and the means of expression were inextricably united in formalist analysis, the traditional dichotomy between form and content is irrelevant. University of Missouri Press, Nqderia any case, the one should precede the other, as its justification.

This postulate is the logical extension of the indivisibility of the literary eprsonalidad Yale University Press, Here, especially, fragment is understood as the parts of a text that, because of their internal configurations, recognize the model of literature.

This points to the fact that the artistic quality of something, its relationship to poetry, is a result of our mode of perception. He followed this statement with what has now become one of his most often quoted remarks: What is accidental in them is not the sound: Not so in poetic discourse; here the sounds are deliberately experienced; they enter the clear field of consciousness. The form of a work of art is determined by its relationship with other preexisting forms.


Those who discount it or gloss over it are ignoring literary particularity. It is accidental, linear, sporadic and most everyday.

Borges continued to write poetry until his death in It seems more useful to explore the true extent to which they naaderia be said to form the preamble to the self-conscious literary practice that followed. I undertook it, not to pretend that the rather ordinary milonga had hidden felicities, but to show what any verbal form pereonalidad set going in us. Borges then goes on to analyze in six brief paragraphs exactly how the milonga works.

Nadería de la personalidad, La | Borges Center

The contrary occurs in the verses, whose usual law is the subjection of meaning to euphonic necessities or superstitions. I will cite just three of the many examples available. In their earliest writings, many formalists attempted to put literary studies on independent ground and to make the study of literature a science separate from what they saw as extraneous studies or disciplines. The basic question, then, is not how to study literature, but rather what the subject matter of literary study is or should be.

Benjamin Sher Elmwood Park, Ill: The Borgesian Impact on Literature and borgfs Arts, ed. In such indications, the length and acoustics of the paragraphs are of necessity accidental. Rather, guided by genre expectations and the conspicuous absence of a fictive narrator, Hutcheon and many other readers seem to focus almost exclusively on the more salient characteristics of self-referential thematization.


Nadería de la personalidad, La

After this brief introduction, Borges unravels one his most significant theoretical pieces. Beyond the more obviously meta-fictional features fictive footnotes, editorial commentary, etc.

These essays were virtually unknown in the West until the sixties. What was required, above all, was a strong appearance of factual truth, capable of producing that willing suspension of disbelief which, for Coleridge, is the essence of poetic conviction; I want to find out how. In Jakubinskiy had already written: That intricate game of changes, of successful frustrations, of enthusiasms, exhaust for me the esthetic act.

The essay ends with the following prescription: I prefer, at this point, to examine just how it works.

After completing the analysis, he continues: Borges observes of the milonga: Jakobson had already suggested that the subject of literary scholarship is not literature in its totality, but literarinessor that which makes a given work a work of literature.

Regardless of the emphasis chosen, the singular importance of the device remains intact in both versions: It is sufficient to focus on three specific principles: