जनहित याचिका (Janhit Yachika). by अँड. वि. पु. शिंत्रे (Adv. V. P. Shintre). ISBN: Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this. Title, Meri Janhit Yachika Evam Anya Kahaniyan. Author, Pradeep Shrivastav. Language, Hindi. Year, Binding, PB. Pages, p. ISBN, , Bharat Main Janhit Yachika Aur Manav Adhikar by Aruna Rai, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide.

Author: Kazrakus Milabar
Country: Andorra
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Photos
Published (Last): 9 December 2007
Pages: 492
PDF File Size: 19.38 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.19 Mb
ISBN: 651-5-44130-831-4
Downloads: 67796
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zuluktilar

The court must be satisfied that the Writ petition fulfils some basic needs for PIL as the letter is addressed by the aggrieved person, public spirited individual and a social action group for ianhit enforcement of legal or Constitutional rights to any person who are not able to approach the court for redress.

In DecemberKapila Hingorani had filed jachika petition regarding the condition of the prisoners detained in the Bihar jail, whose suits were pending in the court.

In Public Interest Litigation PIL vigilant citizens of the country can find an inexpensive legal remedy because there is only a nominal fixed court fee involved in this. It was felt that their interests are undermined by the government. However, the person filing the petition must prove to the satisfaction of the court that the petition is being filed for a public interest and not just as a frivolous litigation by a busy body “.

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) – “Janhit Yachika”

Of late, many of the PIL activists in the country have found the PIL as a handy tool of harassment since frivolous cases could be filed without investment of heavy court fees as required in private civil litigation and deals could then be negotiated with the victims of stay orders obtained in the so-called PILs.


All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from June The guidelines also directed for sexual harassment prevention. yacuika

In Citizens for Democracy through its President v. Join Us on Facebook Powered By gktimes. Case That Saved Indian Democracy. The court declared that till the legislature enacted a law consistent with the convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women which India was a signatory, the guidelines set out by the court would be enforceable. Since the Amar Singh petition was vague, not in conformance with the rules of procedure and contained inconsistencies, the court did not explore his primary grievance infringement of privacy.

Retrieved from ” https: In Kalyaneshwari vs Union of Indiathe court cited the misuse of public-interest litigation in business conflicts.

Naina Kapoor decided to initiate a PIL to challenge sexual harassment at work place, in this supreme court. In Miss Veena Sethi v.

In such a situation, the court directly accepts the public interest litigation. Proudly Powered by Blogger. The judgement of the case recognized sexual harassment as a violation of the fundamental constitutional rights of Article 14Article 15 and Article Courts may also proceed on the basis of letters written to them, or newspaper reports.

Any public-spirited person can file a PIL case. Helping the ministry was former Chief Justice of India late P. Bhagwati and Justice V.


janhit yachika HINDI NEWS

A Public Interest Litigation Janhit Yachika means litigation for the protection of jnhit public interest matters. What is a Public Interest Litigation? Writing the judgment in a case concerning sewage workers, Justice Singhvi stated: Policy making and implementation of policy are conventionally regarding as the exclusive domain of the executive and the legislature. After the emergency era the high court reached out to the people, devising a means for any person of the public or an NGO to approach the court seeking legal remedy in cases where the public interest is at stake.


The 38th Chief Justice of India, S. The Court entertained a letter from two professors at the University of Delhi seeking enforcement of the constitutional right of inmates at a protective home in Agra who were living in inhuman and degrading conditions.

From Wikipedia, jajhit free encyclopedia. The bench clarified that it was necessary to erase the impression on some that the superior courts, by entertaining PIL petitions for the poor who could not seek protection of their rightsexceeded the unwritten boundaries of their jurisdiction. The Charter Act Bhagwati who pioneered PIL.

There after many cases like this have registered in the supreme court.